Which statement is correct regarding IFR departure procedures for USAF jets?

In the context of IFR departure procedures for USAF jets, the correct reasoning centers around the specific operational guidelines set for military aviation.

The statement that military aircraft may use non-standard takeoff minimums with specific authorization is accurate. This flexibility allows for mission-specific departures that may not adhere strictly to civilian standards, acknowledging that military operations can involve various tactical considerations which may necessitate different criteria than those typically applied in civilian aviation.

Furthermore, the assertion that USAF aircraft cannot flight plan using "see-and-avoid" operations aligns with the requirements for IFR operations. Military aircraft operating under IFR must comply with established air traffic control protocols and instrument flight rules that do not rely on visual references but instead on instruments for navigation and obstacle avoidance.

Therefore, both the allowance of non-standard takeoff minimums with appropriate authorization and the requirement to adhere to IFR protocols without relying on visual avoidance strategies make the combination of these two points the correct answer. This combination highlights the operational flexibility and rigor that characterize military aviation, particularly in the context of navigating busy airspace or conducting critical missions.