Which statement is true regarding non-standard takeoff minimums at Pagosa Springs for IFR departures?

The statement that a departure under IFR is authorized on runway 19 if the aircraft can meet or exceed the specified climb gradient is correct because it aligns with standard procedures for IFR departures in locations requiring non-standard takeoff minimums.

In the context of IFR operations, when the takeoff minimums are non-standard, pilots must adhere to specific climb gradients that have been established to ensure adequate terrain clearance during the initial climb. This is particularly relevant at airports like Pagosa Springs, where terrain may influence flight paths.

When a climb gradient is specified for a particular runway, such as runway 19 in this case, it means that pilots must verify that their aircraft can achieve and maintain this gradient under the conditions of the departure. If the aircraft meets or exceeds this climb gradient, it can safely depart under IFR. This emphasizes the importance of analyzing aircraft performance and ensuring that the aircraft has the necessary capability for a safe climb out, especially in challenging geographical areas.

Other options may involve considerations related to fuel levels, single-engine performance, or other aspects of flight operations, but they do not directly address the specific regulations tied to meeting climb gradients for non-standard takeoff minimums at Pagosa Springs, which is the essential requirement for IFR departures from this runway.